Texas Cannabis Legalization Bills Propose 15% Wholesale Tax, 20% Retail Tax and New Licensing System

Burn After Reading The 30-second intel for operators and investors ⏱ 0:30

Texas House bills 362 and 369 would legalize adult-use cannabis with a 15% wholesale tax and a 20% retail tax, but commercial licensing would not begin until November 1, 2028, and the bills remain at the prefiling stage.

• Operators: Operators would face separate wholesale and retail taxes, with local governments able to set hours, locations and store counts. The final burden depends on transfer prices, markups and how much is passed to customers.
• Investors: The timeline complicates decisions on property, cultivation infrastructure and financing, since licensing rules and costs stay unknown. Democrats hold the House and governorship, but Republicans control the Senate, so passage needs bipartisan support.
• Do now: Model margins under separate 15% wholesale and 20% retail tax scenarios, and track the 90th Legislature, which convenes January 12, 2027, before committing capital to Texas.

Short on time? You’re done. Want the numbers?Keep reading ↓

Texas lawmakers have introduced competing proposals to legalize adult-use cannabis, raising new questions about how the state would tax marijuana businesses, regulate commercial sales and determine when operators could enter a potentially multibillion-dollar market.

House Bill 362, filed November 9 by Democratic Rep. John Bucy III, and House Bill 369, introduced by Democratic Rep. Joe Moody, would establish a statewide regulatory framework covering cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, processing, transportation, testing and retail sales.

Both proposals, titled the Texas Regulation of Cannabis Act, would permit adults 21 and older to possess up to two ounces of cannabis, including no more than 15 grams of concentrate, and cultivate up to 12 plants at home.

For businesses, however, the most consequential provisions concern taxation, licensing and the timetable for establishing a commercial market.

Two Taxes on the Cannabis Supply Chain

Under the House proposals, transfers of cannabis from cultivators to retail establishments would face a 15% tax. Retail sales would face an additional 20% cannabis tax, on top of applicable general sales taxes.

The proposed structure would create separate tax obligations at the wholesale and retail stages of the supply chain.

For operators, the distinction matters. Wholesale taxes can affect purchasing costs and margins before products reach consumers, while retail taxes increase the final price paid at dispensaries.

The combined economic burden would depend on wholesale transfer prices, retail markups, and how much of the taxes businesses pass along to customers. You can’t simply add the two rates to calculate an effective tax on retail sales.

The legislation would direct 50% of cannabis tax revenue to education, 25% to veterans’ assistance, 15% to substance-abuse prevention and treatment, and 10% to local governments.

The proposals would assign commercial licensing and oversight to the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, creating a framework for licensed cultivation, processing, transportation, testing, and retail operations.

Local governments could regulate operating hours, locations, and the number of cannabis establishments, but they would not be permitted to prohibit or unreasonably restrict licensed businesses.

Legalization Would Not Mean Immediate Commercial Sales

The House bills also establish a distinction between the effective date of legalization and the availability of commercial licenses.

If enacted in their introduced form, the measures would take effect September 1, 2027. State regulators would have until July 1, 2028, to complete implementing rules, with commercial licensing required to begin by November 1, 2028.

That schedule would give prospective operators time to evaluate the market, but it would also delay the beginning of regulated commercial activity.

For investors, the timetable is particularly relevant to decisions involving property acquisition, cultivation infrastructure, retail locations and financing.

Companies could begin preparing for market entry before knowing the final licensing requirements, compliance costs or competitive landscape.

The legislation also would not guarantee immediate sales upon the issuance of licenses. Operators would still need to secure approvals, establish supply chains and satisfy applicable regulatory requirements.

Senate Proposal Creates Another Legislative Path

A separate proposal, Senate Bill 237, filed by Democratic Sen. Carol Alvarado, would establish another framework for legalizing and regulating cannabis cultivation, sales, testing and possession.

The Senate legislation provides an alternative to the House proposals, leaving lawmakers to determine which regulatory and taxation provisions, if any, could attract sufficient support.

The distinction matters because the 2026 elections changed Texas’ political landscape without giving Democrats control of both legislative chambers.

Democrats won the governorship and a majority in the Texas House, while Republicans retained control of the Senate. Consequently, adult-use legalization would still require support across party lines or negotiations capable of overcoming opposition in the upper chamber.

The proposals remain at the prefiling stage. The 90th Texas Legislature convenes January 12, 2027, and none of the bills changes existing cannabis law.

A Potential Multibillion-Dollar Market With Unresolved Economics

Texas already has a regulated medical cannabis program under the Texas Compassionate Use Program, which operates separately from the proposed adult-use market.

Legalization could substantially expand the addressable market for cannabis businesses, but the eventual commercial opportunity would depend on the number of licenses, retail access, tax rates, and the ability of regulated operators to compete with existing illicit sales.

The House proposals illustrate the central economic trade-off facing lawmakers: generating public revenue through cannabis taxation while establishing a legal supply chain capable of offering competitive consumer prices.

For businesses considering Texas, the immediate question is not simply whether cannabis legalization has become more politically feasible following the elections.

It is whether lawmakers can agree on a regulatory and tax structure that allows a licensed industry to operate profitably.

Those questions will remain unresolved until the Legislature begins considering the proposals in 2027.

The intersection of cannabis regulation, capital investment, and market access will also be part of the discussion at IgniteIt’s Cannabis Capital & Policy Summit in Washington, D.C., on November 18.